Title of the Book (in italics when typed, underlined when written)  Ex: Twilight	Animal Rights
Author(s) or Editor Ex: Stephanie Meyer	Sunni Bloyd
Publisher  Ex: Little, Brown and Company	Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Year of Publication  Ex: 2003	1990
City of Publication Ex: New York	San Diego
Mode of Access (Print if you read the actual book, Electronic if you found it online, or through your kindle/nook/ereader):  Ex: Print	Print
Eddition if indicated:

FIVE FACTS FROM THE SOURCE (Embedded): EX: After having known Edward for just a few short months, Bella admits that “it would cause [her] physical pain to be separated from him now" (Meyer 283).

Sunni states that "Young pigs are taken away from there other as soon as possible so that she can be rebred" this shows that farmers or workers are in a way abusing their animals" (Sunni 72).

Ricard proposed a bill forbidding the mistreatment of horses, he says " I propose making abuse, ill-treat and mare a crime" (Richard 24).

The ASPCA says "Students don't need hands-on experience to learn about science" (ASPCA).

Sweden passed a animal protection law, in 1988 saying that "Cattle, pigs, and chickens must be allowed freedom of movement." (Sweden 80).

Summary of Source (Three-Four Sentences of the Who, What, Where, Why, and How in your own words. NO OPINION): 

Credibility of Source: 
Author or Editor: Who is the author? What training have they had? If there is no author, examine the editor. 
 The author of Animal Rights is Sunni Bloyd. She has had training living in Orange a city in Florida. She went to a University there and published more than two books about animal cruelty.
Attachment: Does the author or editor have anything to gain from writing this, or is it simply informative? 
This book is simply informative for all the readers to gain knowledge about animal abuse. So, that these readers can understand how serious this situation is. Also, so they can understand how cruel it is and go fight for it.

Bias: Do you detect a bias (a favoring of either side) in the author's writing? 

Yes, I think that animal abuse should be immediately stopped. I think this because animals are just like humans and if you test out something on a dog it would the same thing on a human being meaning the same pain. If we don't want to be experiments to a lab test that means animals don't want to be experiments to a lab test.
Use of Source: How will you use this source in your project? 
 I will use the examples from this story in my writing because it will help support my topic better. It will show my readers that animal experimentations are cruel. It will show them how testing products on animals is the same thing as testing products on humans. 

book source

Title of the Book (in italics when typed, underlined when written)  Ex: Twilight	Animal Experimentation Cruelty or Science
Author(s) or Editor Ex: Stephanie Meyer	Nancy Day
Publisher  Ex: Little, Brown and Company	Enslow Publishers, Inc.
Year of Publication  Ex: 2003	2000
City of Publication Ex: New York	New Jersey
Mode of Access (Print if you read the actual book, Electronic if you found it online, or through your kindle/nook/ereader):  Ex: Print	Print
Eddition if indicated:	Revised

FIVE FACTS FROM THE SOURCE (Embedded): Animal activists say that people who care about protecting endangered animal and preserving natural areas "Should also want to save animal from being experimented on" (Doug 59).

Darrow says that he thinks the experiments where cruel instead of teaching students about dissection, such as, when he states "I thought that was that we has killed this animal to dissect it, and how little most of the students where learning"( Darrow 26).

Chimpanzees and humans have at least 98.5% of their DNA in common as Jared Diamond has called " The third chimpanzee" (Jared 53).

Most scientists use rodents primarily also rats and mice because they are cheap and readily available such as when they "reproduce quickly and are good models for many studies" ( Tom 56).

Jeremy Bentham argued that " The suffering of animals is not outweigh the good for humans" stating that the suffering of animals is worth as much as the suffering of humans ( Jeremy 57).

Summary of Source (Three-Four Sentences of the Who, What, Where, Why, and How in your own words. NO OPINION): 



Credibility of Source: 
Author or Editor: Who is the author? What training have they had? If there is no author, examine the editor. 

Nancy Day is the author of Animal Experimentation. She has had training through several other books she has written such as Hate Groups and Teen Rights. She also has had training at the Penn State University.


Attachment: Does the author or editor have anything to gain from writing this, or is it simply informative? 
The author is writing this story so it is simply informative. Although, she also wrote this because she wants animal cruelty to stop and so that people and students stop doing their experiment on animal.




Bias: Do you detect a bias (a favoring of either side) in the author's writing? 
Yes, the author obviously shows that she wants to stop animal abuse. Also, she shows that animals should stop being tested on products and lab experiments. She strongly shows what she believes in.



References: Does the author cite references in the writing? If so, do these add or take away from the credibility? 
It adds because it shows more facts and opinions on the subject she is fighting for. Also, other peoples opinions help her prove her point. They support her belief.
 

Use of Source: How will you use this source in your project? 
It gives me for information on animal abuse it will help me with examples. Also, it will show me that animal abuse is a very serious topic. In Addition, It helps me realize how lab tests on animals is very  cruel.